CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:25:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
> I believe there are NO rules for taxonomic names above
superfamilial names. <

There are no official rules for taxonomic names above
superfamily, as the ICZN (International Comission on
Zoological Nomenclature) specifically does not deal with
them.  However, there are suggestions, with greater or
lesser following.  For example, the Treatise on Invertebrate
Paleontology has set up a standardized way of dealing with
higher taxonomic groups.  A few years ago, Starobogatov
suggested a standardization in the Bulletin of the ICZN.  I
do not think existing widely-used names will be changed to
match his ideas, but they do provide a handy model when
proposing new names.

    Dr. David Campbell
    Old Seashells
    University of Alabama
    Biodiversity & Systematics
    Dept. Biological Sciences
    Box 870345
    Tuscaloosa, AL  35487 USA
    [log in to unmask]

That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand
Exalted Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G.
Wodehouse, Romance at Droitgate Spa

ATOM RSS1 RSS2