LISTSERV - CONCH-L Archives - LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	CONCH-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: varietal names c. 1890
From:	Allen Aigen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:27:10 GMT
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (5 lines)

ICZN Experts;
If a name was proposed for a varietal form in 1890, clearly indicated to be a member of an established species but given a new varietal (latin, descriptive) name, does that name have any current status?  Should it be cited in synonomy, and if so, as a species name or as a variety?
Thanks,
Allen Aigen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.UGA.EDU