CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:40:37 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>Hi Peter:
>Well, as Art says it's impossible you get the real answer. You can
>choose between 57 sps for Zeigler & Porreca (1969), 176 sps. for
>Petuch & Sargent (1986) or "only" 74 sps. for Tursch & Greifeneder
>(2001).
>
>Who is more reasonable? In the last book you can read a very
>critical study about the Genus that can convince you (or not). In
>any case I think that it's a new point of view to consider the
>characteristics of any shell and particularly the Olive shells.

Petuch is a most incredible splitter. Not reasonable at all, methinks.
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin
New Zealand
<[log in to unmask]>
Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2