CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:32:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
I have a suggestion: Lets eliminate "Tribes" altogether. Do we really need that designation to understand where mollusks belong?
    The Question Man
>
> From: "Gijs C. Kronenberg" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 2005/01/12 Wed PM 01:23:57 EST
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: was separating tribes from genera
>
> Hi,
>
> Jung's paper (as often happens with papers by paleontologists) is simply overlooked or ignored by collectors and students of recent species, just as it is the other way around.
>
> I love those questions, and here's one more: why aren't Aporrhaidae, Struthiolariidae as well as Pugnellidae and Rostellariidae not regarded as subfamilies of Strombidae?
>
> As I tried to argue earlier, those choises, how carefully considerated by a scientist, remain at least partly, subjective. To which (sub)family would one allocate Orthaulax species, and what to do with the Rimella-like species?
>
> Gijs
>   Kay and others,
>
>   In 1974 a paper dealing with the Terebellum was published by the Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, NY.;
>
>   Jung, P. 1974, A Revision of the Family Seraphsidae (Gastropoda: Strombacea), Palaeontographica Americana, Vol. VIII, No. 47, 72pp, 16 pl.
>
>   The abstract states, "Terebellum and its relatives are treated as an independent family within the Superfamily Strombacea, and its species are revised taxonomically. The Seraphsidae are subdivided into the three genera Seraphs Montfort, 1810,  Paraseraphs, new genus, and Terebellum Röding, 1798. ..."
>
>   In "Classification of Mollusca" (1997) Victor Millard places Terebellum in a conventional taxonomic placement within the Family Strombidae, yet recognizes the Family Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 in the Stromboidea.  The extinct members of Seraphs and Paraseraphs are quite similar to Terebellum.  Has Jung's work been superceded, overlooked or dismissed by a more recent publication?
>
>   So also, in addition to Kay's question "why Terebellum is included in Strombidae", I would pose to any Stromboidea experts on the list the flip-side, "why Seraphsidae is not a Subfamily within the Strombidae.
>
>
>
>

PLEASE NOTE: My new, long-term, and correct email address is: [log in to unmask] Please update your records!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2