CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
frhinkle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 16:45:56 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Then you would have to see my special specimen or someone
elses. Where would that end?
Fred in MN
 
----------
> From: es <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: "Most Beautiful Species" -NOT!!
> Date: Tuesday, March 23, 1999 5:09 AM
>
> >   My suggestion would be to pick (say) 20 families and
have a vote.
> >Maybe 25. The results would not mean a thing, but they
might be of some
> >interest to people who need a life. ---like me. My first
vote would be:
> >Oliva-----rubrolabiata.
> >    Art
>
> But what would the criteria be? Colors? Size? (size
doesn't matter),
> symmetry? Architecture?
>
> I wouldn't mind playing around with a most beautiful
species discussion.
> To see what other people consider is a beautiful natural
object is interesting.
> But let's at least set a few loose criteria. And don't
forget to say *why*
> you think a
> particular species is beautiful...that's the most
interesting part, to me.
>
>
> Elizabeth
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2