Hi Bill,

That may possibly be all I need, but it might help for me to read the context a bit more.

Thanks so much,

Susan

> On Mar 29, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Bill Fenzan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Susan,
> 
> I have a copy of the book by R. Bieler.  As far as I can see, he does not use the exact words "an unresolved species complex".  Here is what he does say:
> 
> pp. 276-277, in the 'Pseudotorinia architae-group' section: "Many nominal species have been described for Recent and fossil members of this group (e. g. ." [nine examples are given.] "Their synonymy, especially of names based on Atlantic fossil material, is only partly resolved.  The present data allow only a preliminary grouping.  New names in this group should not be introduced without further study of the fossil material."
> 
> Is this all you need?  There are other places in the species accounts where the author discusses problems with this group, but the passage above is the closest I could find to your quote.
> 
> If John scans the pages of the section for you you should be able to see everything that is said.
> 
> Warm regards,
> 
> Bill Fenzan
> 
> Norfolk, VA

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------