Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 23 Apr 1999 08:57:24 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If my memory does not fail me, Abbott illustrates both species, concinna
and cincinniformis (both Sowerby, 1841). Concinna is from the Romblon
Province, just north of Panay Island and cincinniformis is endemic to
Lubang Island, off the west coast of Mindoro Island. The major difference
between the two is the shape. Concinna is more slender with a 'pointier'
apex.
Hugs,
Kurt
At 07:49 AM 4/23/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Antonio,
>
>Abbott uses Helicostyla (Hypselostyla) concinna (Sowerby, 1841) in the
>Compendium of Landshells.
>
>Ken Zentzis
>Wichita, Kansas
>
>> Antonio Jimenez wrote:
>> > Hello, all: it's Helicostyla concinna (Sowerby, 1.841) or H. cincinna
>> (Sowerby, 1.841)?
>> This species is included now in the genus Phengus?
>> I would like to contact with experts in the caribean landshells ( I am
>> clasificating in this moment an old collection with many shells of
>> Cuba and Jamaica and I need help ).
>> Thanks.
>> Antonio Jiménez.
>
|
|
|