Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 20 Apr 1998 08:46:19 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Art and Kim,
Although tempting, I refuse to respond to this line of discussion. But,
ooh, baby, my fingers could fly all over the keyboard!
XXX, Kurt
At 09:09 PM 4/19/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Kim;-
> You got right! Museums DO hide the most interesting things out of
>public sight. The excuse may vary. The public wouldn't understand. We
>don't want to encourage people to collect shells and thus cause their
>extinction (That one in Ohio, fer criminy sakes).
> I wonder if museums understand that the public would not only
>appreciate seeing but could likely help in the presentation. How many
>shell clubs are out of business because they have nothing to do and
>are tired of the films and lectures. Whatever a museum has can be
>shown---and displayed---and explained by those "gifted" amatuers who
>have no letters after their names, but years of experience with an
>equal desire to share that experience.
> I think that in the last days of Earth, there may well be a
>museum that houses a collection of abandoned museums.
> Art
>
|
|
|