Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 8 Apr 2004 20:43:23 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Andrew G. asserted that the proper genus was Tuba I. Lea, 1833, which is an earlier name for the genus Gegania Jeffreys, 1884. However, Wenz (1939; p. 663) deemed Tuba I. Lea, 1833 to be invalid because that same genus name, Tuba, was employed for a different set of animals by Fabricius in 1822.<
>The species you're discussing can be called Gegania valkyrie Powell, 1971, and it may also be called Tuba valkyrie (Powell, 1971) if Andrew is correct and Wenz isn't. <
There's an ICZN ruling in favor of Tuba Lea. This would make Tuba valkyrie (Powell, 1971) the correct name. Vaught is an author who used Gegania, which is how her name came into the discussion.
Dr. David Campbell
Old Seashells
University of Alabama
Biodiversity & Systematics
Dept. Biological Sciences
Box 870345
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0345 USA
[log in to unmask]
That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at Droitgate Spa
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|