Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:10:52 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom--
Holothurians are echinoderms (but not echinoids), so they should have
tube feet. Perhaps they are there but not apparent. Are they clearly
visible on the California species?
Allen
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:18:12 -0700 Tom Eichhorst <[log in to unmask]>
writes:
> Thanks to all who took a shot at the mystery "worm" from deep waters
> off
> Taiwan. There were no tube feet in evidence, so I eliminated an
> echinoderm.
> It was not segmented, so I eliminated an annelid. I finally went
> with a
> holothurian of the family Psolidae (thanks Bernd Sahlmann). But I
> will
> include all answers so this individual can pick and choose for
> himself.
> Thanks again (Allen, Constantine, David, & Bernd).
>
> Tom E
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on
> molluscs
> To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
> click leave the list.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|