CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Wolff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:12:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I've mentioned Sterba, 2003 before. He seems to me to have a reasonable
approach and excellent illustrations. But to determine the number of valid
species (including formae) covered, I would have to count the number of
bold entries in 8 pages of the index. The only numbers readily available
are 168 pages,1550 illustrations in 62 plates

John

At 06:40 PM 4/9/2004, you wrote:
>>Hi Peter:
>>Well, as Art says it's impossible you get the real answer. You can
>>choose between 57 sps for Zeigler & Porreca (1969), 176 sps. for
>>Petuch & Sargent (1986) or "only" 74 sps. for Tursch & Greifeneder
>>(2001).
>>
>>Who is more reasonable? In the last book you can read a very
>>critical study about the Genus that can convince you (or not). In
>>any case I think that it's a new point of view to consider the
>>characteristics of any shell and particularly the Olive shells.
>
>Petuch is a most incredible splitter. Not reasonable at all, methinks.
>--
>Andrew Grebneff
>Dunedin
>New Zealand
><[log in to unmask]>
>Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2