CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:32:22 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
>It seems that different UV nm wavelengths work differently.  Will a long
>wave UV 375 nm - 405nm work better, or a shortwave UV 254nm?  I certainly
>liked John Wolf's approach that just to show the dealers the UV put them on
>notice that you were alert to fakes, or doctoring.

I have tried both LW and SW UV. It doesn't seem to make any
difference to Recent or fossil shells' fluorescence; it will be the
shell pigments fluorescing, not the minerals. I don't know whether it
will make any difference when used on glues, fillers etc used by the
fakers, but certainly at least some glues should fluoresce under both
SW & LW.
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin
New Zealand
Fossil preparator
Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
‚ Opinions stated are mine, not of the University of Otago
"There is water at the bottom of the ocean"  - Talking Heads

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2