CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Froehlich <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:53:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Paul,
If it is not a European species then why is Anadara inaequivalvis
(Bruguiere) listed on page 42 of Poppe's and Goto's "European Seashells"?
They describe it as a Lessepsian (??) species that migrated to the
Mediterranean about 30  years ago.  Do you suppose it is all the same thing?

(Apologies, I do not have the new 2 vol Austrailian SeaShells that might
have answered this question for me.  Seashells of Western Austraila does not
mention it and neither does Shells of the Philippines )

Beth DeHaas
Whitefield, ME
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Monfils, Paul <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [CONCH-L] Mystery Arc shell


>Anadara inequivalvis (or inaequivalvis - I have seen it both ways) is not
>European.
>I  have specimens from both Australia and Japan.
>Paul M.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2