DSSAT Archives

DSSAT - Crop Models and Applications

DSSAT@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tesfalidet Ghebreab <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DSSAT - Crop Models and Applications <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:24:13 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Dear listers,

I used regression equations developed by Hutson (1986) and Schulze et
al (1985) to calaculate drained upper limit (DUL), lower limit (LL) and
saturated soil water content (SAT). The results from both equations were
comparable. However, the difference between SAT and DUL was below 5% for
some of the soil layers and greater than that for others. Is it okay if
I use them as inputs to the soil water balance module in DSSAT as they
are? Do I have to modify the measured soil bulk density so that the
difference between SAT and DUL is equal for all layers?

Thanking you in advance.

Tesfalidet A. Ghebreab
University of Natal
School of Environmental Sciences
PMB, South Africa

ATOM RSS1 RSS2