CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Whipple <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Mar 1998 15:27:56 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
It's Röding (with an umlaut) which can also be spelled Roeding.
 
Peter Whipple
[log in to unmask]
 
At 05:24 PM 3/26/98 -0500, Paul Monfils wrote:
>Thanks Gert!
>
>How interesting!  Apparently Lamarck proposed Nassa as a new genus
>for the species Linnaeus had named Buccinum mutabile (which we now
>know as Nassarius mutabilis), in 1799.  However, the Muricid genus
>Nassa, named by Roding, dates from 1798, just a year earlier!  I
>would guess (but will wait to hear from the pros) that this is why
>the Muricid genus Nassa is valid, but the Nassariid genus Nassa has
>been replaced by Nassarius.  This raises yet another mini-question.
>Is the author's name spelled Roding, or Roeding?  I see it both ways.
>
>Paul M.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2