CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gary Rosenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Mar 2000 17:18:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>>> "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> 03/16/00 11:00AM >>>
I am interested in knowing if the new ICZN has succumbed to Webster's
spelling of "binomial". I have always preferred "binominal" which the
old ICZN uses, since I can't see dropping the final "n" in "nomen" in
order to make the adjective. But then, why change the "e" to "i" in
either case. Oh, to be more educated !


The ICZN continues to use "binominal" despite the preference of Merriam-Webster for "binomial". Many biologists also use "binomial", perhaps influenced by its use in mathematics, e.g., "binomial distribution".

In Latin "nomen" is singular, "nomina" is plural, and the root for forming combinations is "nomin-", for example, "nomination".

Gary


""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Gary Rosenberg, Ph.D.                  [log in to unmask]
Academy of Natural Sciences            http://www.acnatsci.org
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway         Phone 215-299-1033
Philadelphia, PA 19103-1195 USA        Fax   215-299-1170

ATOM RSS1 RSS2