Thanks Monika!

My M. occa, if that's what is, is a mere 113mm.

The Mytilid is about 178mm and it's probably not P. viridis.

The cold rain just stopped in Durham, NC
David Kirsh

> From: Monika Forner <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:42:41 -0800
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: record size request
>
> Well, I just happen to have the latest edition around:
>
> Perna viridis:  165.9 mm  (Victor Dan)
> Murex occa:    127.1 mm  (Bunjamin Dharma)
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Monika
> in sunny and warm San Diego
> _________________________________
> Monika Forner, Ph.D., Linguistics Manager, MT
> Bowne Global Solutions
>
> Phone      (+1) 858-737-5221
> Fax          (+1) 858-737-5297
> [log in to unmask]
> www.bowneglobal.com
>
>
>
> David Kirsh
> <mediashun@MINDS       To:     [log in to unmask]
> PRING.COM>             cc:
> Sent by:               Subject:     record size request
> Conchologists of
> America List
> <CONCH-L@LISTSER
> V.UGA.EDU>
>
>
> 01/21/02 07:10
> PM
> Please respond
> to Conchologists
> of America List
>
>
>
>
>
>
> OK, no one could help me with record size Perna viridis.
>
> What's the record size Murex occa?
>
> (Sometimes size matters if it has spines)
>
> David Kirsh
> Durham, NC