CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
mike gray <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 09:31:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Patty Jansen wrote:

> As a consequence of the publishing of the above book, I have received a
> number of confused E-mails from people who notice that the common names for
> one and the same species vary between books. And I have been forced to
> mention, again and again, the three most important things about common names:
>
> 1. Don't use them
> 2. Don't use them
> 3. Don't use them
>
> I'll get off my soap box now

The problem with scientific names is that they vary between books, they
change weekly, and none of the taxonomists can agree on the scientific
name for a given organism.  They do, however, help taxonomists and
malacologists gain recognition and tenure (common name for which is
"higher soap box".

ATOM RSS1 RSS2