CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Laevichlamys cookei vs. cuneata
From:
Cecil Bankston <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:10:32 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
I found that WORMS lists Laevichlamys cookei as unaccepted, a synonym of 
cuneata.  The scallop.nl site of Henk Dijkstra still shows cookei as a 
valid species. What is the basis for WORMS showing it as unaccepted?

-- 
Cecil N. Bankston
Baton Rouge, LA

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2