Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:53:00 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Bill,
That may possibly be all I need, but it might help for me to read the context a bit more.
Thanks so much,
Susan
> On Mar 29, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Bill Fenzan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Dear Susan,
>
> I have a copy of the book by R. Bieler. As far as I can see, he does not use the exact words "an unresolved species complex". Here is what he does say:
>
> pp. 276-277, in the 'Pseudotorinia architae-group' section: "Many nominal species have been described for Recent and fossil members of this group (e. g. ." [nine examples are given.] "Their synonymy, especially of names based on Atlantic fossil material, is only partly resolved. The present data allow only a preliminary grouping. New names in this group should not be introduced without further study of the fossil material."
>
> Is this all you need? There are other places in the species accounts where the author discusses problems with this group, but the passage above is the closest I could find to your quote.
>
> If John scans the pages of the section for you you should be able to see everything that is said.
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Bill Fenzan
>
> Norfolk, VA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|