CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 16:33:05 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Right you are, Paul. Well, almost completely right. It's masculine and
feminine -ensis, but neuter -ense. A similar situation holds for other
Latin adjectives ending in -is: masculine -is, feminine -is, neuter -e. So,
for instance, these species names should be corrected to end in -ense:
 
Cardium guanacastensis
Cerithium erythraeensis
Bittium vancouverensis
 
Latin has some advantages. It doesn't change with next year's slang. It was
a formerly universal language in western Europe, so it's not hard to find a
dictionary. The zoologists and botanists of yesteryear developed it into a
well-honed tool for describing the shapes of living things. And it's a much
simpler and more consistent language than some others; for instance, it is
pronounced the way it is spelled (at least in principle). But zoologists
are becoming increasingly impatient with the irregularities, and many
proposals have been made to reform and simplify the rules. So far, Latin
still rules nomenclature, irregularities and all; but that may be so for
very much longer.
 
Andrew K. Rindsberg
Geological Survey of Alabama

ATOM RSS1 RSS2