CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: types
From:
"Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:08:57 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
Wups, sorry, Henk, I didn't mean to prop you up as a straw man. Anyway, by
now I think everyone sees that the term "cotype" has been used in so many
conflicting ways that the ICZN recommends that it not be used for new
material.

Andrew K. Rindsberg
Geological Survey of Alabama

ATOM RSS1 RSS2