Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:37:06 -1000 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Jean-Philippe,
SUBSTOR-potato v3.5 has the capability to simulate growth at different
CO2 concentrations. I hope this helps on your way to resolving the apparent
discrepancy.
Sincerely,
Richard
At 01:26 PM 8/22/02 +0000, Jean-Philippe Brassard wrote:
>Dear Listers,
>
>I wanted to know if substor has been modified like ceres and cropgro to take
>into account the CO2 fertilizer effect in DSSAT v.3.5? I'm asking because in
>the v3 user guide, only ceres and cropgro are mentioned as having been
>modified, but when I did simulations with substor-potato at different CO2
>levels, I had different results (yields). I might also mention that some of
>these results were quite suprising: in some instances, yields were lower at
>higher CO2 concentrations...
>
>Thank you all for your help and time,
>
>
>Jean-Philippe Brassard
>Étudiant gradué
>Laboratoire de climatologie
>Département de géographie
>Université de Montréal
>tel: (514) 343-8039
>email: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
>http://www.hotmail.com
>
|
|
|