Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 15 Apr 2001 21:18:12 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Henk and Zvia Mienis schrieb:
> Our knowledge is constantly growing: recent DNA studies within the
> Strombidae have shown that Gibberulus and Canarium are not related at all to
> each other or to the genus Strombus and should be treated as different
> genera. I have the slight feeling that it will take 20-30 years until we
> have adjusted to such names as Canarium mutabilis, Gibberulus gibberulus,
> Tricornis tricornis and Conomurex persicus to name only a few Strombs.
> Best regards,
> Henk K. Mienis
Dear Henk,
can you please name the paper where this new Strombidae systematics was
published, or where it is referenced in a shell guide?
It seems obvious to me, that e. g. Strombus gigas, S. pugilis and "Strombus"
gibberulus belong to seperate genera, especially if you look at Cypraeidae,
where quite similar shells are even classed in separate subfamilies nowadays.
Greetings from Germany
Michael
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Michael Hoelling
Chemnitzer Str. 89
44139 Dortmund
Germany
Tel. +49-231-134173 or +49-173-3295335
Fax +49-231-134086
email: [log in to unmask]
"In omnibus est Limax" (C. Linnaeus)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|