Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:22:49 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I third the idea, I was confused in the beginning and from what has been
answered, sub-family, tribe, & gerna all over lap. So, why not make it
easier on us older folk, eliminate.
Harry B.
[log in to unmask]
EarthLink Revolves Around You.
> [Original Message]
> From: John Wolff <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 1/13/2005 9:11:42 AM
> Subject: Tribes
>
> At 10:32 PM 1/12/2005, you wrote:
> >I have a suggestion: Lets eliminate "Tribes" altogether. Do we really
need
> >that designation to understand where mollusks belong?
> > The Question Man
>
> Good idea, Art. I have been ignoring the concept for 20 years -- mainly
> because I also did not understand it. It's complicated enough with
families
> and sub-families. How many of those are there at this moment? And who has
> the "correct" version?
>
> John
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
> To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
> click leave the list.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|