Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 6 Sep 2008 18:00:10 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Williams, Bogan, & Garner, 2008 report 120mm max. for imbecillis.
Could it be a Pyganodon? cataracta to 170mm, grandis to 254mm.
John
Lancaster, PA
>I've just returned from a visit to my sister-in-law's farm just
>north of Charlottesville, VA, just on the east side of the Blue
>Ridge. In the drought this summer, a raccoon, most likely, dug up an
>Utterbeckia imbecillis (Say, 1829) from their farm pond (that's
>"stock tank" for the Texans among us) so, naturally, I commandered
>it and brought it home with me. It's just about identical to those I
>recovered from Lake Blackshear here in south Georgia when its dam
>broke a while back. There is a difference, however, that shakes my
>confidence in the ID. That is that the thing is 153 mm long. Does
>anyone know if U. imbecillis gets that big?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|