Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CONCH-L Archives
Request a List
Request a List
UGA Help Desk
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CONCH-L Home CONCH-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Low tides and Cedar Key
From:
David Kirsh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:41:04 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Bill, A couple of weeks ago, I had a chance to go to Cedar Key--the islet
10 minutes off the tourist strip. Part of the key was posted off-limits.
Maybe that was related to the fact that a tourist had found the skeletons
of 3 native Americans: man, woman and child from a couple of hundred years
ago washing out of the sand a few weeks before.

I saw lots of broken and bleached shells, but no grit. I couldn't figure
out how I was missing anything if it was there -- because the Jacksonville
website to lists 153 species. Any clues why the discrepancy? Was there a
particular spot? Were most of the listed species dredged?
--David K.

>Despite all the hype, while the tides were lower than usual, they were
>not all that low.  About 6 years ago, the tides here in Florida were in
>fact very low - the lowest this century. While the Jacksonville Shell
>Club had routinely shelled Cedar Key with tides that were only in
>the minus 1+ foot range, during that period they were nearly minus
>2 feet.  Surprisingly, the difference between a minus 1 plus foot
>tide and a minus 2 plus foot tide didn't translate well to the amount
>of substrate available.
>
>Specific tidal measurements and dates are available upon request.
>
>Bill F.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.UGA.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV