CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Monfils, Paul" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:26:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
While we are still engrossed in culinary conchology, let me ask a question I
have always wondered about.  In the "clam" tribe and the "mussel" tribe, we
eat everything but the shell.  Yet in the many species of the "scallop"
tribe that are used as human food, only one small piece, the adductor muscle
that holds the two shell valves together, is eaten.  This seems like an
awful waste.  Why is this so?  Is it simply (as someone mentioned earlier)
that the rest of a scallop just doesn't taste good?
Paul M.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2