CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 12 May 2000 23:55:30 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Hi Nancy,
I'd say you have them both correct - C. miliaris and C. ovum.  Neither the
"form inocellata" of C. miliaris nor the "form chrysostoma" of C. ovum are
valid names, in my humble opinion.  Both names just represent the outer end
of the bell curve representing normal color distribution.  "C. miliaris
inocellata" is a light colored form in which the white spots are indistinct
because of the lightness of the ground color ("inocellata" = "unspotted").
"C. ovum chrysostoma" is a form with particularly dark coloration of the
teeth ("chrysostoma" = "gold-mouth").  Both forms intergrade smoothly into
specimens of average coloration.
Paul M.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2