CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
From:
helmut nisters <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 May 1998 07:12:23 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
As I found out for the moment Homo sapiens sapiens was
described by Linnaeus in 1758. Therefore - I hope I  can
give you informations later - is the question concerning
to be a lectotyp wrong. For the moment I didn't find out, if
Linnaeus described himself as holotyp. This might be possible
if he looked into a mirror guarding and measuring  himself.
Let me some time to find it out. If the holotyp of Homo sapiens
sapiens is wellknown, a you can't choose a lectotyp. It's unneccesary
and not correspondending with the rules of nomenclature.
Please correct me if you know more about this and lectotypes.
 
yours Helmut Nisters from Innsbruck (Austria)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2