Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 17:27:47 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<004401c17cd4$6c54eae0$588bfea9@WinstonBarney> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Marlo
-----Original Message-----
From: Conchologists of America List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Barney, Winston
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Unio ID ?
Paul,
A good example of the advantage of using of descriptive nomenclature vs.
patronymics.
Winston Barney
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Monfils" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: Unio ID ?
> I think I found it. I found a list of common and scientific unio names
> online. Because of the interior color, I played a hunch and looked for
> species called "purple ... something". or "pink ... somthing". After
> striking out on a few pinks and purples, I opened an image called
> "purple pocketbook" (why don't marine shells have names like this?).
> Anyway, the species that goes under that name is Potamilus purpuratus.
> The image looks like my shell, but if there are other species similar to
> this, I would like to know. Thanks.
>
> Paul M.
|
|
|