CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Constantine Mifsud <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:05:09 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Andrew Grebneff wrote:

> So I have about 80,000 of these 6x50 tubes... they are absolutely
> IDEAL for micros... except that they may ruin shells. I must say that
> the damage to my shells occurred while they were stored at work. I
> have seen NO deterioration of shells stored only at home in these
> same vials, so I am not about to dispose of them. But I DO have to
> check the contained specimens now and then!

I think that humidity plays a big part in these reactions and could probably be
my main problem. This rules out gelatine capsules as well. But if the capsules
are sealed in the glass tube..............it may work.

Thank you ALL who responded to the preservatives problem.
--
Constantine Mifsud,
4, Shepherds' Str.,
Rabat RBT 02,
MALTA.
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2