CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Andrew Dickson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Mar 2003 20:26:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
> In my opinion, you have a specimen of C. largillierti.  Not a bad
> thing,
> because this species (or form of C. anabathrum Crosse) is harder to
> obtain
> than C. sennottorum.

Bill,

On the subject of questioning whether it is a form of C. anabathrum, I
would say that it is more closely related to C. sennottorum.  If memory
serves correctly, their surfaces are sort of waxy smooth.

The large C. anabathrum on the west coast of Florida and the smaller east
coast C. anabathrum is probably the same species based on what I have
seen from the Florida Keys.  C. burryae is definitely just a form of the
east coast C. anabathrum.  C. anabathrum tranthami seems to be a
legitimate something unlike C. burryae.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2