Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jun 1998 10:44:21 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think it is an oversimplification to say that conchologists study
"just the shell" while malacologists study "the whole organism". It
is certainly true that a conchologist concentrates on the shell.
However, a malacologist's research may focus on any aspect of
molluscan behavior, systematics, physiology, anatomy, or
biochemistry, and some such studies will inevitably concentrate on
the shell. A conchologist, in my opinion, is primarily a hobbyist,
while a malacologist is first and foremost a scientist. The term
"hobbyist" does not suggest a lack of in-depth knowledge or
expertise. On the contrary, many advanced conchologists undoubtedly
know more about their subject matter - shells - than many
malacologists do. However, their emphasis is not on scientific
research. That, I think, is the dividing line between conchology and
malacology. A researcher who is investigating the protein content or
trace elements or crystalline configuration or mechanical strength or
rate of dissolution of shells is certainly a malacologist, even though
he/she is studying "just the shell".
Paul M.
|
|
|