LISTSERV - CONCH-L Archives - LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	CONCH-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Content-type:	text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
Sender:	Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Olividae
From:	Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:40:37 +1200
In-Reply-To:	<001c01c41e07$a901fa60$10642750@casa>
MIME-version:	1.0
Reply-To:	Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (27 lines)

>Hi Peter:
>Well, as Art says it's impossible you get the real answer. You can
>choose between 57 sps for Zeigler & Porreca (1969), 176 sps. for
>Petuch & Sargent (1986) or "only" 74 sps. for Tursch & Greifeneder
>(2001).
>
>Who is more reasonable? In the last book you can read a very
>critical study about the Genus that can convince you (or not). In
>any case I think that it's a new point of view to consider the
>characteristics of any shell and particularly the Olive shells.

Petuch is a most incredible splitter. Not reasonable at all, methinks.
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin
New Zealand
<[log in to unmask]>
Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.UGA.EDU