Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:01:41 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
O.K., Peggy:
Question: Can (or should) a beachworn "typeshell" be replaced by a better conditioned example? Purists will argue "NO!" But it might be worth talking about.
Art
"I think of my happy condition, surrounded by people like you!"
--
PLEASE NOTE: My new, long-term, and correct email address is: [log in to unmask] Please update your records!
---- Peggy Williams <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ho, Ho. Have you looked at C B Adams' types? Most of them are so
> beachworn they are hardly recognizable (true also of some of
> Reeve's, not to mention Nowell-Usticke's!)
>
> Peggy
>
> On Jun 1, 2007, at 12:42 AM, worldwide wrote:
>
> > Type shells are typically more representational of a
> > species rather than of superior quality.
>
> Peggy Williams: shell collecting trips
> author of Shallow Water Turridae of Florida and the Caribbean
>
> Visit my website: www.Shelltrips.com
> PO Box 575
> Tallevast FL 34270
> (941) 355-2291
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|