Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 Aug 2010 14:30:19 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Some years ago - 1995 or 1996 I think it was - I collected 50mm-ish
specimens myself in Porthcawl, southern Wales, UK.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Conchologists List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John
Wolff
Sent: zondag 8 augustus 2010 14:15
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CONCH-L] Upper size limit for Nucella lapillus?
The 1999 WRS lists it as 49.6mm
John
Lancaster, PA
At 09:56 PM 8/7/2010, you wrote:
>I was wondering what the upper size limit or even WRS might be for Nucella
>lapillus...most of my books list 2 inches and the largest I have seen
>offered for sale were in the 50-55mm ballpark from a "now extinct"
>population somewhere in the Netherlands I think it was ...it sounded like
>the habitat was lost due to factors other than collecting (?) ...does
>anybody know of large specimens or localities that have produced large
>specimens, either here in the US or in Europe (including the one in the
>Netherlands?).
>
>The largest specimen I have seen in the US was just under 50mm, at Acadia
>National Park, on the "left" side of the Bar at Bar Harbor....fresh dead,
>49.8mm. Quite elongate
>
>Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|