Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Nov 1998 22:50:17 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Great point Sir Art (oh one of all universal wisdom and dang good pun
spinner) ....there will never be an agreement on splitting , I'm sure sir
Bob of St Pete(( he who finds and collects the neatest marginellas with out
a doubt)) couldn't disagree with this. I believe that DNA comparison will
be the final icebreaker here , but then that would put an end to such
fantastic discussion BUT this is where it stands , slight differences in a
color pattern does not a new species make. I can see where dominicanus has
the light back ground causing the "spots " to be more pronounced, Granarius
on the other hand has a much taller spire almost falling into the leptoconus
gradiconus form, thus i would consider this a separate species because
structure of the shell is different. wouldn't structure changes prove that
it's different from the "parent " species?? all suggestions would be
appreciated, mark
-----Original Message-----
From: MR ART WEIL <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, November 02, 1998 8:32 AM
Subject: Internet Message
>Mark and Bob;-
> When you come to some conclusions re: cardinalis, take a good
>look at the splits issuing from cedonulli. Species names in this
>complex seem to depend on which island it comes from. Maybe they are
>all legitimate, But I do think a second look may be warrented.
> Art
>
|
|
|