Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:39:55 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Andrew and Harry etc.
I think that Harry and I agree that martinianum is a seperate species,
but I think aquatile is not the same as pileare. The aquatile that I
have seen from off Miami and the Florida Keys is usually small, but
quite adult and is also wider than pileare and colored more like
martinianum. Or am I thinking of rubeculum occidentale Clench and
Turner that was found off of Hollywood Fl. Now I think I'm confusing
myself. I don't think I have a picture of the animal.
Kay Lavalier wrote:
>
> Andrew Vik
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Harry:
>
> I dropped the ball on my Cymatium info. I actually had my specimens
> from Hawaii divided into C. pileare and C. aquatile ( as well as C.
> nicobaricum and
> C. gemmatum, which cannot be confused with the
> pileare-aquatile-martinianum complex). Alison Kay's book made the
> distinction between to two quite clear. Now, I have been calling my
> Caribbean specimens C. pileare martinium without much careful thought.
> I was not even aware that C. aquatile was present in the W.Atlantic. I
> will have to re-examine my S.FL. specimens. Does C. aquatile live in
> the Fl. Keys also, or just the S.Caribbean?
>
> Andrew
>
> Harry G. Lee wrote:
>
> > Dear Bob, Betty, et al.,
> >
> > Your observation is a valuable one and appears to be on the mark,
> > but I am
> > inclined to call the three species C. nicobaricum, C. aquatile, and
> > C.
> > martinianum.
> >
> > Harry
--
Check us out at our Website: www.theshellstore.com
348 Corey Ave , St. Pete Beach, FL 33706
727-360-0586 Fax 727-360-3668
|
|
|