Sender: |
|
Mime-version: |
1.0 |
Date: |
Tue, 23 May 2000 14:48:19 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It is impossible to keep an up to date classification today: the literature
arriving in one day cannot be read by one person only, so...
I use a combination of:
The base is Vaught, in addition we use often Wenz, sometimes still Thiele,
also Moore
+
- books on families
- articles here and there
With all this, you get something correct for 80 %.
Best, Guido
‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
Visit Conchology, with over 50000 names with author, 3800 indicated type
species, 5000 conchological images, and fun with shells.
http://www.conchology.uunethost.be/
‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
> From: Jan Haspeslagh <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 20:50:19 +0200
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Mollusca classification reference works ?
>
> Hello all,
>
> Clearly enough the book by K. Vaught will not be enough for our marine
> library to cover the Mollusca classification in an undisputable way. So
> here the question : who can point this librarian to a couple of other
> reference works (books, by preference) that would cover this subject
> (even if these contradict or question other works on the same item, no
> problem, that's what scientific progress is all about).
>
> Thanks very much already for all answers.
>
> Jan Haspeslagh
> librarian Flanders Marine Institute
>
|
|
|