CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-version:
1.0
Date:
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:43:23 -0800
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject:
Re: Check
From:
David Kirsh <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
I agree. Except doesn't the consent have to be documented? We'll require
pen shell written on paper mussel.

David Kirsh

> From: "Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:20:58 -0600
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Check
>
> I don't want to criticize a person who obviously sent a private message to
> the listserver by mistake; we all do that now and then. But please, let's
> not get into a discussion of politics on Conch-L, except insofar as it
> affects mollusks. You *can* discuss sex as long as it is between two
> consenting mollusks.
>
> Andrew K. Rindsberg
> Geological Survey of Alabama

ATOM RSS1 RSS2