CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Nassa/Nassarius?
From:
Henk and Zvia Mienis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:41:27 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
Dear Paul,
In the older literature Nassa has been used world-wide to indicate
Nassarius. At the same time Jopas was used for present day Nassa. This
confusion was cleared when the correct names were applied according to the
type species of both Nassarius and Nassa. Today both names are used in their
correct name world-wide.
Regards,
Henk K. Mienis
----- Original Message -----
From: Monfils, Paul <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 8:05 PM
Subject: Nassa/Nassarius?


> Question:  Why do European folks use the name Nassa, rather than
Nassarius,
> in speaking of species in the family Nassariidae?  Isn't Nassa a genus in
> Muricidae?
>
> Paul M.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2