CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ross Mayhew <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 02:25:30 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Had to get my couple of cents' in on this one: i really don't know why
anyone would ever complain about the way 'percs look: they are a natural
part of the shell, and having them present (they don't nessessarily have
to be mounted, since often the interior of  a shell is quite lovely....)
simply adds to the completeness and scientific value of a specimen.  As
to aesthetics, admittedly they don't add much sometimes, but is this
really any reason to disparage them??  As long as they are from the same
species as the shell they inhabit, they are a useful and interesting
part of "the shell world", and every effort "should" be made to obtain
and retain them.

-Ross.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2