CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ellen Bulger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 11:45:54 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi Harry!

I'm a beginner where carriers are concerned and my collection is small, but I
have one shell that might have been attached live. Unfortunately, I'm moving
and I packed my Xenos away yesterday, so I can't look at the shell in
question, but I collected one in the Abacos (another fab Cordy outing) that
had both halves of a bivalve on it. I'm not sure of the species, but it was
one of the more delicate Lucine clams. Definitely not pensylvanica, but maybe
orbicularis. Afraid I'm a real "duh" when it comes to bivalves.

This is the nicest self-collected Xeno I have. Of the twenty-five or so that
I have collected, more than two thirds of them are veterans indeed; long-dead
battle-scarred old gnarly ones. I had looked for years without finding any
Xenophoras so I'm really excited when I find any. I even keep fragments.

The little clam on this choice specimen is dime-sized and gem. It was
attached in a horizontal position and closed. The clam was not alive when I
found the snail. Do you think it might have been alive when it was attached?

Ellen Bulger
Fellow Xenophora Fancier

ATOM RSS1 RSS2