CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 13:47:55 +1200
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>The way I originally interpreted the question, I thought Eduard was asking
>for two very similar species in two different families respectively.

There are two nonconspecific species here in NZ which cannot be
separated on shell characters if the protoconchs are missing. One is
a cerithiopsid, the other a metaxiine triphorid. It's a pain, as I
have quite a few specimens of this pair missing protoconchs, and
labelling/cataloging with the species "this OR that" is not
convenient.

Of course it could be argued that Triphoridae and Cerithiopsidae are
not really distinct anyway...
--
Andrew Grebneff
165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand
<[log in to unmask]>
Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut

ATOM RSS1 RSS2