CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Alfonso Pina <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:56:08 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
> The term "Florida horse conch" is precise, accurate, and perfectly
> understood by everyone, even the snottiest of taxonomists. What I find
> amusing is those that sneer at common nomenclature while arguing about
> what it should be called. Big thingamajig? Humongous snail? Big hard
> brown shell with orange flesh?  How about "Florida horse conch"? The
> latter we all understand.

That's right. We can also use "Almeja" for all Venerids, a name that we all
understand, isn't it?
By the way, this could simplify taxonomy a lot, which maybe it is not a bad
idea.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2