CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Date:
Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:27:52 -0700
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: interesting camera
From:
Ellen Bulger <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines) 
I've used the Kodak version of an underwater "disposable" for years.
Supposed to go to 12 feet, I've taken them to 40 with scuba. They don't
implode, but you have to come back up to 12' to advance the film. This
new camera sounds much better. But even the Kodaks are better than the
Fuji version which claim to go to 12', but leak if they so much as get
wet.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2