Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:17:33 +1300 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Let me throw in my two cents by now...
>If the switch from lecitotrophic to planktotrophic is controlled by some
>environmental variable, like e.g. population density, then it could go forth
>and back from one generation to the next, depending on the environmental
>conditions. An animal issued from a planktotrophic egg will probably come to
>another location, where it could lay lecitotrophic eggs (provided it finds a
>mate; land pulmonates, which I mostly deal with, are not so demanding. OK,
>dispersal of land snails would be another thread).
>The mate could also be the descendant of a local, currently lecitotrophic
>population. As long as there are no mechanisms restricting the gene flow
>between different subpopulations, there will be no species split.
>Greetings from Germany
>Michael
My point exactly.
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
64 (3) 473-8863
<[log in to unmask]>
Fossil preparator
Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut
_________________________
I want your sinistral gastropods!
_________________________
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
|
|
|