Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:39:59 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<a06002004bbbf611e0ff8@[203.167.180.40]> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Andrew and all,
It is not a real albinos, as the lip and the canal of the specimen are
colored. I remember the animal was rather pale, but not white.
For those who are interested, here is a link to some pictures of my
"albinistic" S. pugilis, with a normal one (found in the same place) for
comparaison : <www.zonatus.com/Pugilis.htm>
Regards
Bruno
www.zonatus.com
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Conchologists of America List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]De
la part de Andrew Grebneff
Envoye : samedi 25 octobre 2003 04:11
A : [log in to unmask]
Objet : Re: Strombus pugilis albinos
Beware... a white shell does not mean albinism. To be sure of this
you would have to examine the animal; if unpigmented imn a
normally-pigmented species, then you could say that it is albino.
However a white shell can be produced by a nonalbinistic animal.
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
64 (3) 473-8863
<[log in to unmask]>
Fossil preparator
Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut
_________________________
I want your sinistral gastropods!
_________________________
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
|
|
|