CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 08:15:58 -0300
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: littorina obtusa vs obtusata
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<000e01c3d230$20205980$67cbfea9@carobqkocciids>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
Wiggers <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines) 
No. The specie name must agree whith the genus genera (male,
female or neutral - in latin). Turbo is male, and Littorina is
female (Am i right??), then the name must be changed.

Wiggers.

 --- olivier caro <[log in to unmask]> escreveu: > CLEMAM ?
> So if Linnaeus never mentionned any Turbo obtusus, at least in
> european seas, obtusa may be a typographic error.
> Thanks
>
> Olivier
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Riccardo Giannuzzi-Savelli" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: littorina obtusa vs obtusata
>
>
> > Turbo obtusatus Linné, 1757
> > Syst. Nat. ed. X:761
> >
> > There are no species named obtusa by Linné.
> >
> > All the best
> >
> > Riccardo Giannuzzi-Savelli

______________________________________________________________________

Conheça a nova central de informações anti-spam do Yahoo! Mail:
http://www.yahoo.com.br/antispam

ATOM RSS1 RSS2